The reason true scientists can never connect with true believers is because of this base core belief structure. Many other core social structure they have learned/built, is built on top of this specific core belief that morality comes from god and the need to get into heaven by following gods rules. The Inverse property applied would mean that without god and heaven then there is no reason to be moral and no basis for morality. This leaves the scientist with a question that is needed to be answered before a creationist is able to understand further messaging about why living a scientific lifestyle is moral. There is a simple theory that is clear and tied to our basic scientific beliefs in the concepts of the big bang and evolution. Which is humanity, life on earth and life in the universe is a superorganism.
The notion of life as a superorganism could be the bridge that unifies scientific understanding with morality, a subject often claimed by religious doctrine. A superorganism, in a broad sense, is an organized system or community of smaller, interdependent organisms functioning as a whole. Examples in nature include ant colonies, bee hives, and even the human body itself, composed of trillions of individual cells working together.
The theory of life as a superorganism expands this concept to a cosmic scale. Just as cells form tissues, tissues form organs, and organs form an individual, individuals form societies, societies form species, and species, potentially, form a part of a larger, universal entity. This system is interdependent, with every unit playing a crucial role in maintaining the equilibrium and function of the whole.
Under this concept, morality finds a new home grounded in science. If we perceive ourselves as integral parts of this superorganism, our moral duty becomes the preservation and betterment of this larger entity. We are obliged to act in ways that promote the overall health and survival of the superorganism, which includes promoting the welfare of other beings, maintaining the environment, seeking knowledge, and advancing our species.
This perspective does not necessitate the existence of a deity or an afterlife to instill a sense of morality. Instead, it draws from our understanding of the universe and life’s interconnectedness. It acknowledges the natural process of entropy, the gradual descent into disorder, but also recognizes life as a force that counters entropy, bringing order, complexity, and evolution.
Indeed, this aligns with the scientific understanding of life’s origin and evolution. Life, in all its dazzling complexity, has emerged from the basic laws of physics and chemistry. It has evolved over billions of years, constantly adapting, learning, and diversifying. This process, far from being a random or meaningless event, could be interpreted as a purposeful journey toward greater complexity and understanding.
Thus, rather than focusing on life after death, we might shift our attention to the question of life versus entropy. Life, in this context, becomes a remarkable phenomenon that not only resists the universal trend towards disorder but actively works against it, fostering growth, complexity, and understanding. This view offers a scientific basis for morality that is compatible with the teachings of The Church of the Scientific Method, The Religion of Science, and may indeed provide a common ground for dialogue between scientists and believers.
In conclusion, life as a superorganism offers a fresh perspective on the interplay between science, morality, and spirituality. It embodies the principles of scientific inquiry while providing a framework for ethical conduct. It reminds us that we are all part of a larger whole, connected by the shared journey of life against the tide of entropy. As scientists and members of The Church of the Scientific Method, The Religion of Science, we are tasked with the responsibility of safeguarding this remarkable journey, employing the scientific method to illuminate our path toward greater understanding and harmony.